Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:59

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Are you more of a butt guy or a boob guy?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Just in the last 5 years:

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Judge denies defense motion to move R. Kelly to home detention - NBC News

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Cloudy skies can’t dim joy as thousands fill nation’s capital for World Pride parade - AP News

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Thank you.

What disturbed you today?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Massive iron reserve worth trillions discovered could reshape the global economy - Glass Almanac

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Mario Kart World Coins Don't Function As You'd Expect, New Evidence Suggests - GameSpot

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

What’s next?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Texas woman dies from brain-eating amoeba after clearing sinuses with tap water - Dallas News

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) Reports Strong Q1, Stock Jumps 14.3% - Yahoo Finance

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukraine Says It Attacked Crimean Bridge as Traffic Halted - Bloomberg.com